In article <3a33e955@news.povray.org>, "Jan Walzer" <jan### [at] lzernet> 
wrote:

> It would be nice, but I think it would be harder to implement as for
> objects, wouldn't it ???

Motion-blurring glows actually shouldn't be too hard, just divide the 
brightness of each glow by the number of blur samples. However, I don't 
know what you mean by "as for objects"...

BTW, I am re-thinking my idea of attaching glows to objects...maybe 
glows should be an object attribute instead, specifying a glow for an 
object would make that object glow. However, this would make it 
impossible to link multiple glows together without a separate keyword, 
because specifying a glow in a union would make the objects in the union 
glow...maybe something like a "glow_group" object would help instead.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message